Pages tagged "engagement"
Upcoming Webinar: Engaging with First Nations in the Energy Transition
Join Austrade and keynote speakers from the First Nations Clean Energy Network and EY to hear about their reports on the economic and commercial benefits of partnering with First Nations on clean energy projects, in a focused session on Engaging with First Nations in the Energy Transition.
You’ll also learn about the First Nations Clean Energy Network’s 'Proponent's Toolkit’.
This session is designed to support investors and proponents to understand the increasingly material issue of engaging with First Nations communities and to highlight the long-term economic and strategic value of doing so effectively.
Planning (Social Impact and Community Benefit) and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2025 (May 2025)
The Network is concerned the Queensland government's Bill diminishes the value of agreement-making and engaging early and properly with Traditional Owners and First Nations communities.
The Planning (Social Impact and Community Benefit) and Other Legislation Amendment Bill (the Bill) enables proponents to meet their social licence / benefit-sharing obligations by negotiating directly with local governments.
By directing proponents to engage with and enter into community benefit agreements with local councils, the scheme established by the Bill has the potential to silence and diminish the priorities, rights and interests of Traditional Owners and First Nations communities impacted by proposed developments.
The Network recommends that the Queensland Government should clarify that proponents should enter into benefit sharing agreements with Traditional Owners, and that agreements with Traditional Owners should not be set-off or diminished in any way by community benefit agreements with local councils.
Policy frameworks like the First Nations Clean Energy Strategy, and schemes like the Future Made in Australia Act 2024 (Cth) and the Capacity Investment Scheme are taking steps towards specifically incorporating First Nations outcomes in their design.
The Bill, as presently framed, fails to appropriately incorporate First Nations rights, interests and perspectives in its processes. This will diminish the planning system as a whole and the potential for it to shape projects that realise the best value for Queensland.
The Network recommends that the Queensland Government:
- establish a First Nations-specific assessment pathway and guidance for proponents engaging with Traditional Owners and First Nations communities
- require that all SIA include a cultural heritage assessment and incorporate First Nations-defined priorities.
- develop templates and resources to support First Nations participation in community benefit agreements, including governance, monitoring and accountability mechanisms.
Furthermore, the Network recommends that the Development Assessment Rules and the SIA Guideline must be updated to:
- require proponents to engage with Traditional Owners and First Nations communities early and continuously in the project lifecycle
- recognise First Nations people and groups as rightsholders with specific rights and interests in land, culture and development, and that Traditional Owners and First Nations communities must be engaged with and heard in the development of a SIA
- ensure principles of Free, Prior and Informed Consent (as articulated in the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People) is incorporated as a core principle of engagement
- require that providers undertaking social impact assessments must include First Nations people, or at a minimum, ensure that providers are culturally competent and wherever possible, that priority is given to providers with deep local experience and understanding of First Nation community priorities and aspirations in Queensland.
In relation to New State Code 26: Solar farm development, the Network also raises a number of concerns.
Our full submission to the State Development, Infrastructure and Works Committee Inquiry on this Bill can be accessed here.
Read our submission
Project proponents and governments called out on First Nations engagement: South Western Times
Project proponents need to do more to engage First Nations people during the clean energy transition.
Read moreSetting our own protocols for engagement, consultation and approvals
What does it look like when First Nations groups call the shots?
Through designing early engagement and negotiation protocols for government and industry to follow, this session explores what different nations are doing to flip the narrative and set the standard.
SPEAKERS: Daniel Miller, Barengi Gadjin, Daryle Rigney, Jason Bilney, Sonja Dare, Heidi Norman (Facilitator)
On and offshore renewables development - Getting the best from engagement, agreements, partnering, benefit-sharing
Many Traditional Owner groups are contemplating new proposed offshore wind and renewable energy developments on Land and Sea country.
Of primary concern is that rights and interests on Land and Sea are protected, consent has been obtained, and that family and community are participating in and garnering or generating significant benefits through energy projects.
This session looks at where First Nations groups can influence policy and process to ensure meaningful engagement and consent, sincere partnerships, and healthy equity shares.
SPEAKERS: Levi Lovett, Jamie Woods, Kerry Colbung, Keicha Day, Kathy Ridge (Facilitator)